Sequencing Choices: 16S or WGS?

As sequencing becomes more affordable and more options are available, the next big decision is what type of sequencing to use for a research study. In this blog post, we take a short look at two sequencing methods – 16S and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) – and find out the background to each method and its unique characteristics.

16S Sequencing

16S sequencing specifically looks at the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene in bacteria. The utility of 16S was first highlighted in the 1960s by Dubnau et al. who noted conservation of the sequence in Bacillus species. As a highly conserved gene sequence, the 16S rRNA must be a critical component for cellular function.

While the rate of mutation for the 16S genes is not known, and could be different depending on the species, the 16S rRNA gene can still used for identification as the rate of change has a greater impact on relationships of species that are more distantly related. Work by Woese followed as the 16S rRNA sequence became more widely used for bacterial identification and taxonomy.

16S rRNA gene sequences for a large number of strains has been found, meaning that new and unknown sequences are able to be compared against previously sequenced strains. The benefits to 16S are that is relatively cheap and quick to carry out, meaning that it is available for a wide range of research and budgets. The downside however is that it targets a very small portion of the bacterial genome.

While 16S is present in almost all species of bacteria, it isn’t a universal gene. Bacteria could therefore be missing from the results even though they were present. Some bacterial species have multiple 16S genes. With such dynamic genomes, by sequencing one small fragment and assigning a species based on that, information could be lost on the specific strain of bacteria.